John posted a video clip of Kamala Harris doing her thing yesterday in βThese people are crazy.β Like John, I was mystified by Harrisβs description of her attire in addition to her recitation of personal pronouns. Searching (so far unsuccessfully) for the White House text of President Bidenβs unblinking remarks to the NOBLE group yesterday, I came across the text of Harrisβs remarks here.
Harris was observing the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act and speaking at a roundtable with βdisability advocates.β I take it from the context that her self-description was for those who literally could not see. Even in this context, however, Harris managed to direct her focus to the sacrament of abortion:
And so Iβve asked these leaders to come in so that we can discuss these issues and pay attention to the fact that the Dobbs decision and the act of the United States Supreme Court to take away a constitutional right, that had been recognized, from the people of America will impact a lot of people and differently in some situations. And we need to be responsive to these issues and also lift up the voices of all people who will be impacted and the way that they will be impacted.
Etc., etc., ad nauseam. Harrisβs remarks made me wonder how the βdisability advocatesβ feel about the abortion of babies because of their disabilities.
Most Minnesotans are relentlessly normal, but for some reason we have a habit of electing wacky politicians. A current example is our lieutenant governor, Peggy Flanagan. Flanagan is perhaps even more far-left than Governor Tim Walz, and she also adds a twist of the bizarre. As in this tweet:
Minnesotans are good neighbors.
We'll bring you a hotdish when you move into a new neighborhood.
We'll shovel your driveway when it snows.
And we'll protect you if you need an abortion.
β Peggy Flanagan (@peggyflanagan) July 25, 2022
Iβll bet you werenβt expecting that punch line. But todayβs Left espouses the sacramental view of abortion: itβs about the nicest thing they can think of!
The status of the investigation ordered by Chief Justice Roberts following the leak of Justice Alitoβs Dobbs opinion to Politico remains shrouded in mystery. The AP reports that the Supreme Court is resting on its right to remain silent:
The Supreme Court wonβt say whether itβs still investigating.
The court also wonβt say whether the leaker has been identified or whether anyone has been disciplined.
Or whether an outside law firm or the FBI has been called in.
Or whether the court will ever offer an accounting of what transpired.
Or whether it has taken steps to try to prevent a repeat.
To these and other emailed questions, Supreme Court spokeswoman Patricia McCabe said by email: βThe Court has no comment.β
Just in case you were wondering.